ChatGPT helps you work. Who answers your customers?
You already use ChatGPT for emails, quotes and the odd awkward reply. It's good at that. So why not let it answer your customers too?
The short answer
Keep ChatGPT for your own work: CA$25 a month on Plus, or CA$27 a seat a month on Business billed yearly1.
- It works for the person typing.
- Your customers need something else: an agent that answers in your business's name.
- It answers from rules you've approved, with a person a step away.
- Pick ChatGPT for writing and thinking.
- Pick a business agent when messages need answers you can't give in time.
Which one, for which job
Pick ChatGPT if the work is yours: drafting, planning, reading a contract, writing a reply you'll send yourself.
Plus is CA$25 a month for one person1.
Pick a business agent if customers need answers in your business's name when you can't give them.
That's a different job.
The detail
It speaks for the business, follows rules you set, hands off to a person, and someone has to check what it said.
Use both if you're like most owners.
ChatGPT at your desk, an agent for your customers. They don't compete.
Neither yet, if you can answer every message yourself the same day.
Customers like a person.
The detail
87% told Gartner that access to one is essential when companies use AI for service3. If that's you already, keep doing it.
Who it works for, what it costs, who checks it
| What | ChatGPT Plus | ChatGPT Business | A business agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | CA$25 a month1 | CA$27 a seat a month billed yearly, CA$34 monthly1 | Depends on who builds and runs it; ask for the whole year |
| Who it's for | One person1 | Teams of 2 to 2001 | Your customers |
| Whose voice | Yours, when you paste its words | Your team's | Your business's, in its name |
| Your chats and model training | On by default; you can switch it off2 | Off by default for business data1 | Ask whoever runs it, in writing |
| Getting your data out | Self-service export2 | Through your workspace owner2 | Ask before you sign: the conversations and the rules |
| Who checks its work | You, every time you read it | You and your team | Ask who reads what it sent, and how often |
What customers say about bots
In Gartner's survey of 3,566 customers in February and March 2026, only 27% said they'd try a chatbot again after a bad experience3.
The detail
And 87% said access to a person is essential when companies use AI for service3.
So whatever answers your customers has to know where its job ends and hand over cleanly, every time.
The detail
That means a name, a number, and the conversation so far, so nobody has to repeat themselves. When Air Canada's website chatbot got a fare policy wrong, a tribunal ordered Air Canada to pay4.
A year for three people in the office
Example
- Three ChatGPT Business seats billed yearly: 3 × CA$27 × 12 = CA$972 a year1.
- Three Plus accounts: 3 × CA$25 × 12 = CA$9001.
The detail
Business costs CA$72 more a year for the three, and keeps your business data out of training by default1. Either covers your team's own work. Answering customers in your business's name is a separate job, priced by whoever builds it.
Leaving later
On Plus you can export your own chats; on Business, exports go through the workspace owner2, so make sure that's someone in your business.
The detail
With any agent that talks to customers, ask before you sign who keeps the conversations and the rules, and how you'd take them with you.
Where we fit
Otto is the agent we run for our clients: it answers in the business's name, only from what the owner has approved, with a person behind it who answers for what it says.
The detail
Keep using ChatGPT for your own work. We don't publish a price, because every system is scoped to the business it runs.
Sources
- ChatGPT plans and pricing, OpenAI. Read 2026-10-27.
- Data controls in ChatGPT, OpenAI Help Center. Read 2026-10-27.
- Gartner Survey Finds Only 27% of Customers Would Try a Chatbot Again After a Negative Experience, Gartner, 2026-09-02. Read 2026-10-27.
- Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149 (Small Claims, final decision), BC Civil Resolution Tribunal, 2024-02-14. Read 2026-10-27.
Checked on 2026-10-27.


